On March 6th, 2009 at 10:00 am we held
our last team meeting. We met at the Social Services office to
discuss the prospect of placing Mary in the foster home in Fergus
Falls. The whole team attended this meeting except for Mary's lawyer
who had a schedule conflict.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The County Threatens Me
Posted by
john brosnan
at
2:02 PM
Labels:
false allegations,
foster homes,
out of home placement guidelines,
social work ethics,
social work supervisor,
team meeting,
threats
1 comments
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Voice at the End of a Phone Line
Posted by
john brosnan
at
4:47 PM
Labels:
court hearings,
foster homes,
Guardian ad Litem,
illegal detainment,
juvenile justice,
multiple placements,
neuropsych exam,
social work supervisor,
social workers,
vision therapy
1 comments
My Journal — February 20, 2009
Mary was in court today. When I sat with her alone in the little room we talked heart to heart. Not like the social workers do. And Mary came through and cried because she didn't know what the hell was going on in her life..
Mary was in court today. When I sat with her alone in the little room we talked heart to heart. Not like the social workers do. And Mary came through and cried because she didn't know what the hell was going on in her life..
Friday, October 19, 2012
Getting the Neuropsych Exam
Posted by
john brosnan
at
11:09 AM
Labels:
mental health ethics,
neuropsych exam,
nonverbal learning disorder,
parental assessments,
psychological evaluations,
psychological testing ethics
2
comments
On
December 29th Mary had her neuropsychological evaluation. Her social
worker picked her up in Grand Rapids and drove her to Sauk Rapids to get
evaluated by Dr. Tim Tinius. I had been reading about
neuropsychological evaluations and had talked to a number of
psychologists from the Mankato area about how these were conducted. Most
of them told me these tests can take anywhere from three to four hours,
are comprised of a number of individual tests, and are often spread out
over a few days. Usually the parents meet separately with the
psychologist to provide a history of their child in order to rule out
things like birth defects and the like. None of the psychologists I
talked with said they could perform a neuropsych examination in one hour,
and certainly none of them mentioned anything about parental
assessments being any part of a child's neuropsychological evaluation.
Yet, Mary's exam lasted about an hour, the parents were never consulted
(at least not me), and most of the test results were devoted to a
parental assessment.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Visiting Mary at North Homes
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Monitored Phone Calls
Posted by
john brosnan
at
1:33 PM
Labels:
children's rights,
Guardian ad Litem,
parental alienation,
privacy rights
1 comments
A week or so later Mary's corrections
officer, social worker, and guardian ad litem all hopped in a car and
drove all the way up to North Homes to visit Mary. They always traveled together,
and it made me wonder how the GAL maintained any degree of
objectivity regarding Mary's case, or regarding me, after spending so
much time with people who had anything but objectivity about Mary's
case, or about me. Of course, he didn't pretend to be objective so I
guess that wasn't a problem. But maybe I was just a little envious,
since he had spent only about 20 minutes, at best, talking to me, and
was now on a ten-hour ride to North Homes with Mary's workers —
people who automatically rejected every idea I had regarding what I
thought was best for my daughter.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Mary's Missing Meds
Once Mary was back at North Homes I called her almost every day. The staff got to know me well and we would talk while we waited for Mary to come to the phone. Sometimes Mary would call me. And one night after she had been at North Homes for about a week, she called to tell me she wasn't feeling well and wondered if it could be due to her medications. I asked her what she meant by this, and she told me she hadn't taken her meds since she'd arrived at North Homes.
Monday, October 15, 2012
There is Something about Mary
Posted by
john brosnan
at
2:55 PM
Labels:
corrections officer,
lying,
neuropsych exam,
psychological evaluations,
social workers,
team meeting
1 comments
Despite our efforts to convince Mary's workers to get her the neuropsych evaluation Forest Ridge had recommended, Mary's lawyer and I were running into a brick wall. Her corrections officer and social worker simply refused to do this for her even though we felt she needed this more than anything at this point in her journey to nowhere. In order to get this done for Mary, her lawyer had to hold another court hearing and convince the judge to order her workers to schedule a neuropsych appointment for her. The discussion amongst the team then turned to trying to decide where Mary should, not only get her evaluation, but where she should wait until she could get her evaluation.
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Mary is Abused at Elmore – October 5, 2008
Posted by
john brosnan
at
4:04 PM
Labels:
disability,
disability law center,
investigations,
physical abuse,
social services
15
comments
During
one of my visits to Mary while she was at Elmore, she started telling
me how the staff were treating her. She said they restrained her a
number of times, and on one occasion, held her down for almost an
hour. She said four or five big staff persons grabbed her, pushed her
to the floor, and sat on her until she wet herself. It was so
traumatic she wet herself! Think about that! She also said
that one time they punished her by making her stand in the corner of
a room facing the wall with her arms held straight out to her sides.
She had to do this for long periods of time, and if she let her arms
drop, they would make her start this punishment all over. I was
furious when I found out about this. Why did Mary have to tell me
this? Where were her social workers? Where was her corrections
officer? Where were the people that put her in this place and who
were supposedly watching out for her safety? Why weren't they
checking on her while she was in a place they told us had a
history of abusing kids? Why weren't they checking on a child who had
a history of being abused, a child who was placed in a group home
primarily so she wouldn't be abused? I was furious.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Elmore Kid-Jail – September 2008
Posted by
john brosnan
at
2:05 PM
Labels:
attachment disorder,
Guardian ad Litem,
kid jails,
neuropsych exam,
social workers,
team meeting,
treatment plan
2
comments
It wasn't long before Mary got kicked
out of Forest Ridge too.
She was only there about two months,
but like her other placements, her behavior was more than the staff
could handle and required too many of their resources. Mary
definitely was not getting better. Things were getting worse for her
and it was tragic. This was the opposite of what we had expected for
her when we had placed her over a year earlier, and it was the
opposite of what we had been promised. This crazy merry-go-round of
group homes she was on was not stopping, and I couldn't see that
anything was being done to stop it or to help her. All that was
being done, it seemed, was to stop any of my efforts to help her. And
so Mary was now placed back in Elmore — the extremely
punitive kid jail that had a history of abusing children — so she
could wait, while the rest of us... well… we had another meeting.
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I Call an Ombudsman
Posted by
john brosnan
at
3:48 PM
Labels:
abuse,
attachment disorder,
education,
mental health,
ombudsman,
sexual abuse,
stability,
therapy,
treatment plan
0
comments
Next I called an ombudsman and told her
about Mary's case. She also seemed concerned and wanted to talk to
Mary's mother before she would recommend anything. I gave her Karen's
phone number (Mary's mother) and waited a couple of days for her to call me back.
When I didn't hear back, I called her and asked her if she had
contacted Karen and what she had decided to do about Mary's
case. She said she had contacted her, but had now changed her mind
and didn't think it was important to do anything at this point. She
thought it would be best if she just left Mary's case alone. I asked
her why she had changed her mind and she said something like, "I
just don't think it's a good idea to get involved in your daughter's
case at this time." She was vague about her reasons.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Round Robin Reprimands — September 17, 2008
Besides being upset with me, Mary's
workers were becoming more and more upset with her and blamed most
of the problems she was having on her. They would often reprimand her
when she came to the court house for her 60-day hearings. I hated
this. Not that I didn't think Mary was partially responsible for the
problems she was experiencing. She was. But then we all bore some
responsibility for this placement gone terribly wrong, and I hated
that no one would admit this. None of us were free from blame for
what was happening to her, but her workers continued to blame her (or
me) and took no responsibility themselves for the mess she was in. I
hate it when we blame children for everything. Part of their behavior
is due to our behavior — a lot of it actually — and we
can't expect them to take responsibility for their actions if we
don't model this by taking responsibility for ours.
Thursday, October 4, 2012
I Call My State Representative and DHS
Posted by
john brosnan
at
1:56 PM
Labels:
retaliation,
social services,
social workers,
team meeting
0
comments
I contacted my state representative and
told her about Mary's plight. She listened to everything I had to say
and seemed very concerned. She told me she would mention my concerns to
her colleagues at the State Capital and then get back to me. I called
her a week later and she told me she had talked to her colleagues and
their advice for me was to get a lawyer, or file a report with a
state agency. This was frustrating because, not only did I think
calling her was reporting to a state agency, but also because
I thought she would do something herself, especially since it seemed like
what Mary was going through constituted abuse, and I thought state
representatives were mandated reporters.
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Doctor Joel Oberstar
Posted by
john brosnan
at
3:58 PM
Labels:
juvenile justice,
mental health,
psychological evaluations,
social workers
2
comments
A social worker at the State Hospital
where I worked had been to the Minnesota State Social Workers
conference and was telling me about the keynote speaker — Dr. Joel Oberstar. He said this guy has done amazing things with children at
The University of Minnesota, and he told me I should consider
contacting him to see if he could help Mary.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Whose Discharge Plan? – August 2008
Posted by
john brosnan
at
3:31 PM
Labels:
custody,
legal,
social services,
social workers
3
comments
In late August of 2008 I received a
copy of Mary's Forest Ridge discharge plan in the mail, and I was
surprised to discover there had been some talk about discharging her.
I didn't know anything about this. There hadn't been any discharge
plans from the other group homes at this point — at least none that
I was aware of. I was even more surprised when I found out that her
discharge plan was for her to go to her mom's house and not to my
house. This is what the plan said — that she was not to go
to her father's house when she came home. I couldn't believe this and at first I wondered if it might be a mistake. I immediately called Forest
Ridge and talked to the director, Chad, and asked him why this was in
Mary's discharge plan and who had put it there. He told me Mary's corrections officer and social worker had told him this was their plan
for Mary because they said Mary's problems were caused by the tension
between her parents and that "Mary played her parents against
each other." He said their solution was to have Mary live
only with her mother.
Monday, October 1, 2012
Forest Ridge — July 2008
Posted by
john brosnan
at
12:06 PM
Labels:
attachment disorder,
group homes,
multiple placements,
nonverbal learning disorder,
out of home placement,
sexual abuse symptoms
2
comments
Forest Ridge Youth Services, in
Estherville, Iowa was one of best group homes Mary was placed in and
I always wondered why she hadn't been placed there sooner. It was an
attractive place where the kids lived in little cottages on a lake a
few miles outside of the town. From there they would be bused to their
school which was closer to town. And even though Mary was
now in Iowa, she was much closer to home than when she was at North
Homes in Grand Rapids, Minnesota; and because of this, I was able to
visit her more often.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)