On
December 29th Mary had her neuropsychological evaluation. Her social
worker picked her up in Grand Rapids and drove her to Sauk Rapids to get
evaluated by Dr. Tim Tinius. I had been reading about
neuropsychological evaluations and had talked to a number of
psychologists from the Mankato area about how these were conducted. Most
of them told me these tests can take anywhere from three to four hours,
are comprised of a number of individual tests, and are often spread out
over a few days. Usually the parents meet separately with the
psychologist to provide a history of their child in order to rule out
things like birth defects and the like. None of the psychologists I
talked with said they could perform a neuropsych examination in one hour,
and certainly none of them mentioned anything about parental
assessments being any part of a child's neuropsychological evaluation.
Yet, Mary's exam lasted about an hour, the parents were never consulted
(at least not me), and most of the test results were devoted to a
parental assessment.
Showing posts with label psychological evaluations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychological evaluations. Show all posts
Friday, October 19, 2012
Getting the Neuropsych Exam
Posted by
john brosnan
at
11:09 AM
Labels:
mental health ethics,
neuropsych exam,
nonverbal learning disorder,
parental assessments,
psychological evaluations,
psychological testing ethics
2
comments
Monday, October 15, 2012
There is Something about Mary
Posted by
john brosnan
at
2:55 PM
Labels:
corrections officer,
lying,
neuropsych exam,
psychological evaluations,
social workers,
team meeting
1 comments
Despite our efforts to convince Mary's workers to get her the neuropsych evaluation Forest Ridge had recommended, Mary's lawyer and I were running into a brick wall. Her corrections officer and social worker simply refused to do this for her even though we felt she needed this more than anything at this point in her journey to nowhere. In order to get this done for Mary, her lawyer had to hold another court hearing and convince the judge to order her workers to schedule a neuropsych appointment for her. The discussion amongst the team then turned to trying to decide where Mary should, not only get her evaluation, but where she should wait until she could get her evaluation.
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Doctor Joel Oberstar
Posted by
john brosnan
at
3:58 PM
Labels:
juvenile justice,
mental health,
psychological evaluations,
social workers
2
comments
A social worker at the State Hospital
where I worked had been to the Minnesota State Social Workers
conference and was telling me about the keynote speaker — Dr. Joel Oberstar. He said this guy has done amazing things with children at
The University of Minnesota, and he told me I should consider
contacting him to see if he could help Mary.
Friday, September 28, 2012
North Homes 35-Day Assessment
Posted by
john brosnan
at
7:55 PM
Labels:
assessments,
attachment disorder,
disability,
group homes,
mental health,
multiple placements,
out of home placement,
psychological evaluations
2
comments
After spending four days at the New Ulm
Detention Center, Mary's corrections officer next placed her in a
group home in Northern Minnesota — North Homes, in Grand Rapids,
close to the Canadian border. The County seemed to like North Homes.
They also seemed to like places that were far away. North Homes
seemed like a pretty good place for Mary even though it was roughly
five hours from her home. Mary liked the staff at this place and they
liked her. She was at North Homes for about two months for her 35-day
assessment.
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Woodland Hills Four-Day Debacle
Posted by
john brosnan
at
7:14 PM
Labels:
abuse,
assessments,
attachment disorder,
court hearings,
juvenile justice,
out of home placement,
psychological evaluations,
therapy
3
comments
Mary kept moving from one group home to
the next, and after a year into her placement, with 13 moves already,
she still hadn't had an assessment — at least one we could use to
help place her. During one of her 60-day-review court hearings, her
lawyer brought this up and told the judge Mary needed to be evaluated
thoroughly so we could start making more informed decisions about her
placements rather than random ones like it seemed we were doing. She
pointed out how this could most likely prevent her from being moved
so often.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)